Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
SUBLEASE
A “management agreement” for a business is a sublease where the parties agree that the sublessors will have exclusive use of the business premises and assume all obligations under the terms of the lease. Tillimon v. Hasan, Court of Appeals No. L-03-1066, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth Appellate District, Lucas County, Feb. 13, 2004.
On Dec. 30, 1999, the landlord, Tillimon, entered into a 10-year lease with the tenant, Hasan. Under the terms of the lease, Hasan was to lease a building from Tillimon for the purpose of operating a convenience store. At the time that the lease was signed, Hasan operated his business under the name Mighty Mart USA. After the lease was executed, Hasan incorporated the business as Mighty Mart USA. Hasan owned half the shares of the corporation, and Qamari owned the other half. On Sept. 8, 2000, Hasan and Qamari entered into a “management agreement” with the Shannak brothers, who agreed to operate the Mighty Mart and assume responsibility for all of the debts of the business in exchange for keeping all of the business profits. On Feb. 26, 2001, Tillimon sought to evict the Shannak brothers from the premises, claiming that the February 2001 rent and other expenses had not been paid. Tillimon also claimed that Hasan was in violation of the lease because the premises could not be sublet without his permission, which had not been given.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?