Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In today's larger community centers, the developer is often faced with the need to construct the shopping center in phases, either to ensure adequate tenancies before undertaking the next portion of the center or to negotiate a sale of a portion of the shopping center to a large department store user who has its own agenda on when to construct its store. In either case, it is necessary for the developer to address the construction timing of the various phases and to deal with the issue of whether certain phases will be built at all. This article focuses on certain provisions the landlord needs to incorporate into its leases to protect itself in these situations.
The threshold concern relates to the possibility that a particular phase, or portion of the shopping center, may not be built at all. Perhaps the landlord hits a snag in its leasing program, and the lease it is negotiating ends up being one of the relatively few leases in the current phase. Perhaps the landlord has difficulty obtaining a construction loan and decides to forego the phase that contains the lease in question and concentrate on filling up another phase in order to reach leasing requirements imposed by the construction lender or permanent lender of the first phase.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.