Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Developments of Note

By Julian S. Millstein, Edward A. Pisacreta and Jeffrey D. Neuburger
September 02, 2004

DE Approves New Corp Entity To Offer
IP Owners Tax Savings

The Diamond State recently enacted legislation creating a new form of corporate entity, the Headquarters Management Corp. The new entity will be taxable as a corporation, but if an entity elects to limit its activities to investment (eg, managing trademarks, patents, patent applications, trade names and similar types of intangible assets) or providing headquarters-management services to affiliated corporations ' or both these functions ' it can reduce its state tax liability by a maximum of 99%. The size of the tax reduction will depend on the qualified jobs provided to employees in Delaware or the extent to which the entity makes qualified economic-development expenditures. Existing Delaware holding companies can elect to be taxed under this new regime.


Federal Identity Theft Penalty Enhancement Act
Is Signed Into Law

Federal legislation setting higher criminal penalties for identity-theft offenses was signed into law on July 15. The Identity Theft Penalty Enhancement Act, Pub. L. 108-275 (2004), establishes two categories of “aggravated identity theft” for which mandatory enhanced penalties are provided. A penalty of five years of imprisonment is specified for identity theft carried out in connection with terrorism, while a penalty of two years' imprisonment is specified for identity theft in connection with other felonies. These penalties are to be imposed in addition to any sentence applicable to the underlying felonies. One intended target of the legislation is “phishing” for personally identifying information, ie, the use of fake e-mails and Web sites to mislead individuals into revealing personal identifying information. The act would enhance the penalty for commission of a felony with respect to information obtained by phishing.


CA's Withdrawal Of e-Voting Approval Is Upheld

The decision of the California Secretary of State to withdraw regulatory approval for the use of certain electronic-voting systems was upheld against a multipart challenge claiming that electronic voting ensured the right of disabled voters to vote independently. American Association of People With Disabilities v. Shelley, No. CV 04-01526 (C.D. Cal. July 6, 2004). The court held that claims under the Americans With Disabilities Act and disability-related provisions of the Help America Vote Act and the California Elections Code were not likely to succeed on the merits, because the right to vote “unassisted and in private” is not a right currently protected by law. In rejecting the plaintiffs' claims under the equal-protection clause, the court ruled that the decision of the secretary of state to withdraw approval because of concerns about the security of electronic-voting systems was “a rational one, designed to protect the voting rights of the state's citizens.”



Julian S. Millstein Edward A. Pisacreta Jeffrey D. Neuburger

DE Approves New Corp Entity To Offer
IP Owners Tax Savings

The Diamond State recently enacted legislation creating a new form of corporate entity, the Headquarters Management Corp. The new entity will be taxable as a corporation, but if an entity elects to limit its activities to investment (eg, managing trademarks, patents, patent applications, trade names and similar types of intangible assets) or providing headquarters-management services to affiliated corporations ' or both these functions ' it can reduce its state tax liability by a maximum of 99%. The size of the tax reduction will depend on the qualified jobs provided to employees in Delaware or the extent to which the entity makes qualified economic-development expenditures. Existing Delaware holding companies can elect to be taxed under this new regime.


Federal Identity Theft Penalty Enhancement Act
Is Signed Into Law

Federal legislation setting higher criminal penalties for identity-theft offenses was signed into law on July 15. The Identity Theft Penalty Enhancement Act, Pub. L. 108-275 (2004), establishes two categories of “aggravated identity theft” for which mandatory enhanced penalties are provided. A penalty of five years of imprisonment is specified for identity theft carried out in connection with terrorism, while a penalty of two years' imprisonment is specified for identity theft in connection with other felonies. These penalties are to be imposed in addition to any sentence applicable to the underlying felonies. One intended target of the legislation is “phishing” for personally identifying information, ie, the use of fake e-mails and Web sites to mislead individuals into revealing personal identifying information. The act would enhance the penalty for commission of a felony with respect to information obtained by phishing.


CA's Withdrawal Of e-Voting Approval Is Upheld

The decision of the California Secretary of State to withdraw regulatory approval for the use of certain electronic-voting systems was upheld against a multipart challenge claiming that electronic voting ensured the right of disabled voters to vote independently. American Association of People With Disabilities v. Shelley, No. CV 04-01526 (C.D. Cal. July 6, 2004). The court held that claims under the Americans With Disabilities Act and disability-related provisions of the Help America Vote Act and the California Elections Code were not likely to succeed on the merits, because the right to vote “unassisted and in private” is not a right currently protected by law. In rejecting the plaintiffs' claims under the equal-protection clause, the court ruled that the decision of the secretary of state to withdraw approval because of concerns about the security of electronic-voting systems was “a rational one, designed to protect the voting rights of the state's citizens.”



Julian S. Millstein Edward A. Pisacreta Jeffrey D. Neuburger New York Brown Raysman Millstein Felder & Steiner LLP
Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Stranger to the Deed Rule Image

In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.