Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Bankruptcy Hotline

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
September 28, 2004

Embezzlement By Bankruptcy Counsel Tolls Time Bar

The Third Circuit has ruled that a bankruptcy attorney who embezzled money from the estate should not be able to use the statute of limitations as a shield to his malfeasance because the trust placed in counsel may have prevented the debtor and trustee from discovering the theft. In Re: Mushroom Transportation Company Inc., No 02-3754 (August 24).

The debtor and its related subsidiaries filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition that was later converted to a Chapter 7 liquidation. The bankruptcy court later authorized debtor's counsel to open an escrow account to hold the proceeds generated from the sale of the debtor's assets. Unfortunately counsel also embezzled more than $500,000 from this escrow account. The Chapter 7 trustee filed an adversary action alleging conversion, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract and legal malpractice, but defense counsel argued that these claims were time-barred because the debtor had failed to exercise reasonable diligence in discovering the embezzlement. The bankruptcy court agreed, finding that the debtor was not entitled to any “equitable tolling” of the statutes of limitations. The district court affirmed, finding that because the debtor had abdicated its statutory duty to preserve the estate's assets, it also could not show it had been reasonably diligent with respect to the rules of discovery.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Stranger to the Deed Rule Image

In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.