Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
e-Discovery Cost Burdens Are In Flux
Companies can easily incur millions of dollars to recover and search backup computer tapes, and other computer media, to respond to an e-discovery request. A responding company can try to shift these costs onto the requesting party, but that has become harder. The trend of court rulings over the last few years has been to require the producing party to pay the lion's share of the e-discovery costs.
A recent federal court ruling bucks that trend. The decision by a federal magistrate judge in Chicago shows how a producing party can, under certain circumstances, shift most of the burden of paying for e-discovery to the requesting party.
The federal court ruling, Wiginton v. CB Richard Ellis, Inc., No. 02 C 6832, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15722 (N.D. Ill. August 9, 2004), concerned a proposed class-action lawsuit brought by five female employees of the global real estate firm CB Richard Ellis. The employees claimed the company was sexually harassing its female employees by creating a hostile work environment in the firm's U.S. offices.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Stranger to the Deed Rule
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.