Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Reinsurance Arbitration: A Discussion of Neutral Panels and Reasoned Awards
Traditionally, arbitration panels in the reinsurance industry have been tripartite panels with each party choosing its own arbitrator and the party-appointed arbitrators choosing a neutral umpire. Courts have recognized that party-appointed arbitrators may be advocates for the appointing party. Sphere Drake Ltd. v. All Am. Life Ins. Co., 307 F.3d 617, 620 (7th Cir. 2002). (“In the main party appointed arbitrators are supposed to be advocates.”) While the industry has become accustomed to the system of advocate arbitrators and there are those who champion this system, there has been a growing consensus that neutral panels may be preferable to advocate arbitrators.
Another tradition in reinsurance arbitration has been the practice of issuing awards that are not reasoned. This practice has come into question.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
How AI Has Affected PR
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.