Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Concern has arisen among corporate counsel that despite their best efforts at development and monitoring of electronic document retention programs, sanctions ranging from fines or adverse jury presumptions to default judgments may be imposed if electronic information is not handled correctly. Consider, for example, that a company recently was sanctioned $2.75 million after 11 key employees failed to comply with a “freeze” and lost electronic information as their computer files were overwritten for several months.
Recent proposals to amend the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to account for electronic documents and to provide a “safe harbor” limitation on sanctions could provide some relief. As a Feb. 15, 2005, deadline for public comment on the proposed federal rule changes for electronic discovery approaches, corporate counsel concerned with issues arising from discovery in federal litigation of computerized information should take notice.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.