Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The topic of no fault divorce is one which many of my colleagues and I believe goes to the very heart of matrimonial litigation in the State of New York. The vast majority of us feel that it is time to commence a new era of divorce litigation in our state that will reflect the realities of modern life and current thinking in our society as a whole.
I have observed the consequences of the lack of a no-fault divorce alternative not only from the perspective of an attorney who represents upper-middle-class clients, but also from the vantage point of someone who has represented the poor. I am currently a partner at a 12-attorney Manhattan law firm that dedicates its practice almost exclusively to the field of matrimonial law, but I began my practice in 1973 as a poverty lawyer at the Legal Aid Society of Rockland County, where a significant portion of my cases involved the representation of indigent individuals in civil proceedings in the Family Court and in divorce proceedings in the Supreme Court. In addition to several other affiliations, I am a former President of the New York Chapter of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers and I currently serve on the Executive Committee of the Family Law Section of the New York State Bar Association, where I am the Co-chair of its Legislation Committee. Because of my experience as a practicing matrimonial litigator and my bar association involvement, I have seen many things that have brought me to the conclusion that it is time for the State of New York to adopt true no fault divorce.
The Law in New York
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.