Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Associated Press has reported that medical students and physicians are now being taught that an open acknowledgment of regret for medical errors, even an apology, may help doctors avoid malpractice lawsuits. “Doctors Eye Apologies for Medical Mistakes,” http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=235090. In Illinois, malpractice reform legislation includes a concept known as “Sorry Works,” recommending that an apology be offered when mistakes are made or untoward results occur. Within the overall context of medical malpractice risk management, a recent evolution in dispute resolution philosophy suggests that direct, forthright communications between physician and patient may reduce the risk of future litigation.
Saying 'Sorry' Might Be the Best Course
The traditional relationship between physician and patient has as its foundation a historic linkage between ethical behavior and medical practice. The Hippocratic Oath, still pledged in many of our nation's medical schools, defines physician character and patient care responsibilities, the most famous being “first, do no harm.” In ancient times, the Code of Hammurabi addressed the physician's dual responsibility to the patient and to society. In the modern world, bioethics as a specific field of study has emerged as a separate discipline, and ethical behavior remains fundamental to the practice of medicine. Viewed in this light, the movement toward more open communications between physician and patient is consistent with the highest ethical standards of the medical profession.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.