Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Anti-Bootlegging Statute/ Constitutionality
In a ruling of first impression, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California found 17 U.S.C. Sec. 1101(a)(3) of the federal civil anti-bootlegging statute to be unconstitutional. Kiss Catalog v. Passport Int'l Prods., 03-8514. In the suit by members of the rock band Kiss alleging unauthorized distribution of a DVD of a 1976 concert, the district court found the plaintiffs could proceed with their copyright infringement claim because they had pleaded ownership of the footage through a work-for-hire arrangement with concert promoter John Scher, registration of the copyright and alleged infringement by the defendants. The district court then noted that recordings made before Sec. 1101(a)(3)'s effective date of 1994, but distributed after, were covered by the statute. But the court concluded that by creating perpetual protection, the statute violated the limited times element of the copyright clause of the federal constitution. In September 2004, a Manhattan federal district court found 18 U.S.C. 2319A, the federal criminal anti-bootlegging statute, to be unconstitutional partly for the same reason. U.S. v. Martignon, 346 F. Supp. 2d 413 (S.D.N.Y. 2004).
Copyright Infringement/Access
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.