Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Entertainment Law & FinanceKickerFeaturesSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

<b>Counsel Concerns</b>Music Publisher's Defense Counsel To Stay in Case

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
January 28, 2005

Rule 3-310(E) of California Rules of Professional Conduct states that a lawyer “shall not, without the informed written consent of the client or former client, accept employment adverse to the client, or former client where, by reason of the representation of the client or former client, the member has obtained confidential information material to the employment.” Rule 1.10(b) of the American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rules of Professional Conduct states: “When a lawyer has terminated an association with a firm, the firm is not prohibited from thereafter representing a person with interests materially adverse to those of a client represented by the formerly associated lawyer and not currently represented by the firm, unless 1) the matter is the same or substantially related to that in which the formerly associated lawyer represented the client; and 2) any lawyer remaining in the firm has [protected] information … material to the matter.”

Both rules were cited by the California Court of Appeal in a recent ruling involving entertainment industry litigation. After losing her job, Ilene Goldberg, an in-house attorney for Warner/Chappell Music from 1993 to 2002, filed suit against the music publisher. The suit alleged, among other things, gender discrimination and wrongful termination. Shortly after filing the complaint, Goldberg moved to disqualify Warner-Chappell defense counsel Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp (MS&K). Goldberg claimed that she had revealed confidential information to former MS&K partner J. Eugene Salomon when she consulted him in 1997 about her employment with Warner-Chappell. This was just after MS&K began doing legal work for Warner-Chappell. Goldberg said she also had personal and professional relationships with other MS&K lawyers.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Judge Rules Shaquille O'Neal Will Face Securities Lawsuit for Promotion, Sale of NFTs Image

A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.

Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Blockchain Domains: New Developments for Brand Owners Image

Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.

'Insurable Interest' and the Scope of First-Party Coverage Image

This article reviews the fundamental underpinnings of the concept of insurable interest, and certain recent cases that have grappled with the scope of insurable interest and have articulated a more meaningful application of the concept to claims under first-party property policies.