Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
<b>Counsel Concerns</b>Music Publisher's Defense Counsel To Stay in Case
Rule 3-310(E) of California Rules of Professional Conduct states that a lawyer “shall not, without the informed written consent of the client or former client, accept employment adverse to the client, or former client where, by reason of the representation of the client or former client, the member has obtained confidential information material to the employment.” Rule 1.10(b) of the American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rules of Professional Conduct states: “When a lawyer has terminated an association with a firm, the firm is not prohibited from thereafter representing a person with interests materially adverse to those of a client represented by the formerly associated lawyer and not currently represented by the firm, unless 1) the matter is the same or substantially related to that in which the formerly associated lawyer represented the client; and 2) any lawyer remaining in the firm has [protected] information … material to the matter.”
Both rules were cited by the California Court of Appeal in a recent ruling involving entertainment industry litigation. After losing her job, Ilene Goldberg, an in-house attorney for Warner/Chappell Music from 1993 to 2002, filed suit against the music publisher. The suit alleged, among other things, gender discrimination and wrongful termination. Shortly after filing the complaint, Goldberg moved to disqualify Warner-Chappell defense counsel Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp (MS&K). Goldberg claimed that she had revealed confidential information to former MS&K partner J. Eugene Salomon when she consulted him in 1997 about her employment with Warner-Chappell. This was just after MS&K began doing legal work for Warner-Chappell. Goldberg said she also had personal and professional relationships with other MS&K lawyers.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
A Lawyer's System for Active Reading
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.