Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Rule 3-310(E) of California Rules of Professional Conduct states that a lawyer “shall not, without the informed written consent of the client or former client, accept employment adverse to the client, or former client where, by reason of the representation of the client or former client, the member has obtained confidential information material to the employment.” Rule 1.10(b) of the American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rules of Professional Conduct states: “When a lawyer has terminated an association with a firm, the firm is not prohibited from thereafter representing a person with interests materially adverse to those of a client represented by the formerly associated lawyer and not currently represented by the firm, unless 1) the matter is the same or substantially related to that in which the formerly associated lawyer represented the client; and 2) any lawyer remaining in the firm has [protected] information … material to the matter.”
Both rules were cited by the California Court of Appeal in a recent ruling involving entertainment industry litigation. After losing her job, Ilene Goldberg, an in-house attorney for Warner/Chappell Music from 1993 to 2002, filed suit against the music publisher. The suit alleged, among other things, gender discrimination and wrongful termination. Shortly after filing the complaint, Goldberg moved to disqualify Warner-Chappell defense counsel Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp (MS&K). Goldberg claimed that she had revealed confidential information to former MS&K partner J. Eugene Salomon when she consulted him in 1997 about her employment with Warner-Chappell. This was just after MS&K began doing legal work for Warner-Chappell. Goldberg said she also had personal and professional relationships with other MS&K lawyers.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.