Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Chiropractor Forfeits PIP Revenues Due to Illegal Self-Referrals, Illegal Ownership of Diagnostic Facility
In Allstate Ins. Co., et al. v. Greenburg, et al., New Jersey Superior Court, Law Division, Docket MRS-L-3379-03 (Dec. 10, 2004), an unpublished opinion, the court granted summary judgment for a PIP insurer that sought to recover PIP benefits it paid out over a 5-year period. Allstate, the PIP insurer, brought an action to recover PIP benefits paid to a diagnostic facility that was owned by a chiropractor based upon the chiropractor's illegal self-referrals, his illegal ownership of a diagnostic facility and, finally, his illegal employment of a plenary licensed medical doctor at the diagnostic facility.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?