Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
You get a call from the general counsel at a bank that has just received a grand jury subpoena. She's not worried, however, because the subpoena appears focused solely on a customer, Mr. Jones. He is not an employee or agent of the bank, just an unaffiliated investment manager who has been a customer for the past 5 years.
You review the subpoena and, indeed, it asks only for Jones' account records and related documents. Your preliminary investigation and discussions with the prosecutor running the investigation make clear that the government is targeting Jones for bilking his investors, and there's no reason to believe anyone at the bank had knowledge of his illicit dealings. What do you do? Send some junior associates to gather the responsive documents and forget about it? Tell the GC everything's under control and there should be no problem?
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
This article reviews the fundamental underpinnings of the concept of insurable interest, and certain recent cases that have grappled with the scope of insurable interest and have articulated a more meaningful application of the concept to claims under first-party property policies.