Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
FTC Settles Charges e-Comm
Provider Rented Customer Data
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) settled the charges against an online shopping-cart software provider that rented personal information about its merchants' customers to third parties, in violation of the merchants' privacy policies. In re Vision I Properties, LLC, No. 042 3068 (FTC Mar. 10, 2005). The FTC complaint alleged that the provider's actions constituted an unfair practice in interstate commerce. The settlement bars disclosure of previously collected personal information, requires the company to remit the profit it made from selling the information, and bars future misrepresentations by the provider about the collection, use or disclosure of personally identifiable information. The press release is available at www.ftc.gov/opa/2005/03/cartmanager.htm.
The bill revamping the Utah Spyware Control Act was signed into law on March 17, with an effective date of May 2. H.B. 104 defines “spyware” as software on the computer of a Utah resident that “collects information about an Internet website at the time the Internet website is being viewed” in Utah, and uses that information “contemporaneously to display pop-up advertising on the computer.” The definition is further refined to exclude various functionalities, including diagnostic and security software and cookies, among other things. The new legislation revises the Spyware Control Act that became effective last year. The enforcement of the act was enjoined last year in WhenU.com v Utah (Utah 3d Judicial Dist. Ct. June 22, 2004), on the grounds that WhenU had shown a likelihood of prevailing on its claim that the legislation violated the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The text of the legislation is available at www.le.state.ut.us/~2005/bills/hbillint/hb0104s01.pdf.
The Texas Attorney General has filed suit against Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) service provider Vonage, alleging that the company violated Texas consumer laws when it failed to adequately inform subscribers of the service's limited access to emergency 911 calling features. State v. Vonage Holdings Corp., No. GV 500657 (Tex. Dist. Ct. Travis Cty Mar. 22, 2005). The complaint alleges that Vonage advertises its service as a replacement for traditional telephone service, but that the representation is false and misleading because, unlike 911 service provided by traditional telephone providers, Vonage emergency 911 service must be specifically requested, does not automatically inform a 911 call recipient of the caller's location and may, in some instances, give incorrect location information. The service also, the suit alleges among other things, may not be functional during electrical outages. The attorney general's press release, including a link to the complaint, is available at www.oag.state.tx.us/oagnews/release.php?id=850&PHPSESSID=q9h60u5ud7bcsfb90iq94sscg4.
FTC Settles Charges e-Comm
Provider Rented Customer Data
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) settled the charges against an online shopping-cart software provider that rented personal information about its merchants' customers to third parties, in violation of the merchants' privacy policies. In re Vision I Properties, LLC, No. 042 3068 (FTC Mar. 10, 2005). The FTC complaint alleged that the provider's actions constituted an unfair practice in interstate commerce. The settlement bars disclosure of previously collected personal information, requires the company to remit the profit it made from selling the information, and bars future misrepresentations by the provider about the collection, use or disclosure of personally identifiable information. The press release is available at www.ftc.gov/opa/2005/03/cartmanager.htm.
The bill revamping the Utah Spyware Control Act was signed into law on March 17, with an effective date of May 2. H.B. 104 defines “spyware” as software on the computer of a Utah resident that “collects information about an Internet website at the time the Internet website is being viewed” in Utah, and uses that information “contemporaneously to display pop-up advertising on the computer.” The definition is further refined to exclude various functionalities, including diagnostic and security software and cookies, among other things. The new legislation revises the Spyware Control Act that became effective last year. The enforcement of the act was enjoined last year in WhenU.com v Utah (Utah 3d Judicial Dist. Ct. June 22, 2004), on the grounds that WhenU had shown a likelihood of prevailing on its claim that the legislation violated the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The text of the legislation is available at www.le.state.ut.us/~2005/bills/hbillint/hb0104s01.pdf.
The Texas Attorney General has filed suit against Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) service provider Vonage, alleging that the company violated Texas consumer laws when it failed to adequately inform subscribers of the service's limited access to emergency 911 calling features. State v. Vonage Holdings Corp., No. GV 500657 (Tex. Dist. Ct. Travis Cty Mar. 22, 2005). The complaint alleges that Vonage advertises its service as a replacement for traditional telephone service, but that the representation is false and misleading because, unlike 911 service provided by traditional telephone providers, Vonage emergency 911 service must be specifically requested, does not automatically inform a 911 call recipient of the caller's location and may, in some instances, give incorrect location information. The service also, the suit alleges among other things, may not be functional during electrical outages. The attorney general's press release, including a link to the complaint, is available at www.oag.state.tx.us/oagnews/release.php?id=850&PHPSESSID=q9h60u5ud7bcsfb90iq94sscg4.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.
A common question that commercial landlords and tenants face is which of them is responsible for a repair to the subject premises. These disputes often center on whether the repair is "structural" or "nonstructural."