Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Clause & Effect <b>Contestant Releases/Physical Injury Claims

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
April 29, 2005

The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia decided that a contestant on the TV game show “Wheel of Fortune” was barred by a release he signed from pursuing a negligent conduct claim against the show's producer over alleged injuries he sustained during taping. But the court also ruled that the contestant could proceed with his claims of reckless or intentional conduct. Wright v. Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc., 03-2083 (JDB). Will Wright was the winning contestant on a “Wheel of Fortune” segment taped in Washington, DC. In the contestant release form he signed, Wright acknowledged that he waived the right to bring any claims arising from “participation on the program or from use of any prize.” The release also stated in capital letters:


“I AGREE THAT I WILL NOT BRING OR BE A PARTY TO ANY LEGAL ACTION OR CLAIM AGAINST THE RELEASED PARTIES, BASED UPON OR ARISING OUT OF MY PARTICIPATION ON THE PROGRAM OR IN ANY WAY RELATED TO THE PROGRAM, OR ANY EXPLOITATION OF THE PROGRAM, ON ANY LEGAL THEORY (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PERSONAL INJURY …)”


Wright claimed that when show host Pat Sajak approached to congratulate him on winning the show segment, instead of shaking Wright's hand, Sajak “jumped on” Wright, wrapped his arms and legs around him and “kind of like bounced.” The district court first found that District of Columbia law should apply to the suit Wright filed, even though he lived in Virginia, because the contestant release form was “negotiated, signed, and substantially performed” in DC, and because Wright's tort claims arose in DC. The court went on to note that for Wright's negligent conduct claim, “there is no public policy prohibition on enforcing prospective liability waivers. … [T]he Contestant Release Form … is unambiguous and clear so that plaintiff would understand he was waiving his right to bring a claim for personal injuries suffered as a result of his participation as a contestant on Wheel of Fortune.” However, the court also concluded: “[Restatement (Second) of Contracts Sec. 195(1)] articulates a public policy that prohibits enforcement of prospective liability waivers for recklessly or intentionally caused harms. Under that principle, plaintiff's claims of negligence and infliction of emotional distress, to the extent they allege (and plaintiff ultimately proves) reckless or intentional conduct, cannot be waived by the Contestant Release Form signed by plaintiff.”

The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia decided that a contestant on the TV game show “Wheel of Fortune” was barred by a release he signed from pursuing a negligent conduct claim against the show's producer over alleged injuries he sustained during taping. But the court also ruled that the contestant could proceed with his claims of reckless or intentional conduct. Wright v. Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc., 03-2083 (JDB). Will Wright was the winning contestant on a “Wheel of Fortune” segment taped in Washington, DC. In the contestant release form he signed, Wright acknowledged that he waived the right to bring any claims arising from “participation on the program or from use of any prize.” The release also stated in capital letters:


“I AGREE THAT I WILL NOT BRING OR BE A PARTY TO ANY LEGAL ACTION OR CLAIM AGAINST THE RELEASED PARTIES, BASED UPON OR ARISING OUT OF MY PARTICIPATION ON THE PROGRAM OR IN ANY WAY RELATED TO THE PROGRAM, OR ANY EXPLOITATION OF THE PROGRAM, ON ANY LEGAL THEORY (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PERSONAL INJURY …)”


Wright claimed that when show host Pat Sajak approached to congratulate him on winning the show segment, instead of shaking Wright's hand, Sajak “jumped on” Wright, wrapped his arms and legs around him and “kind of like bounced.” The district court first found that District of Columbia law should apply to the suit Wright filed, even though he lived in Virginia, because the contestant release form was “negotiated, signed, and substantially performed” in DC, and because Wright's tort claims arose in DC. The court went on to note that for Wright's negligent conduct claim, “there is no public policy prohibition on enforcing prospective liability waivers. … [T]he Contestant Release Form … is unambiguous and clear so that plaintiff would understand he was waiving his right to bring a claim for personal injuries suffered as a result of his participation as a contestant on Wheel of Fortune.” However, the court also concluded: “[Restatement (Second) of Contracts Sec. 195(1)] articulates a public policy that prohibits enforcement of prospective liability waivers for recklessly or intentionally caused harms. Under that principle, plaintiff's claims of negligence and infliction of emotional distress, to the extent they allege (and plaintiff ultimately proves) reckless or intentional conduct, cannot be waived by the Contestant Release Form signed by plaintiff.”

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Judge Rules Shaquille O'Neal Will Face Securities Lawsuit for Promotion, Sale of NFTs Image

A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.

Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Blockchain Domains: New Developments for Brand Owners Image

Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.

Supreme Court Rules Rejection of Trademark License Does Not Rescind Rights of Licensee Image

Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC The question is whether a debtor's rejection of its agreement granting a license "terminates rights of the licensee that would survive the licensor's breach under applicable nonbankruptcy law."