Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Counsel Concerns

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |

Malicious Prosecution/Anti-SLAPP Motion

The Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, Division Seven, upheld the denial of an attorney's motion to strike a malicious prosecution action filed against him by a company claiming, like the attorney's client, to own the right to sue entertainer Michael Jackson for failure to appear at a concert for the “Jackson Family Honors” TV show. Smith-Hemion Productions Inc. v. Segura, B171299. Jacob Segura had served as counsel to Asset Recovery Co. (ARC), which claimed it purchased at a New Jersey sheriff's sale the right of Joseph Iny to sue entertainer Michael Jackson over Jackson's failure to appear at an Atlantic City concert for “Jackson Family Honors.” (Iny had loaned money to Jackson Communications Inc.) Segura filed suit on behalf of ARC against Jackson and against Smith-Hemion Productions, the show's producer, which also claimed to own the right to sue Jackson. The Los Angeles Superior Court sustained Smith-Hemion's demurrer to ARC's complaint. The Court of Appeal then ruled that ARC lacked standing to sue Smith-Hemion because a New Jersey court had found that Iny wasn't a secured creditor of JCI. In any case, the court of appeal noted that ARC's suit was time-barred because it had been filed after California's 4-year statute of limitations for breach of Jackson's concert-appearance contract had expired.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases Image

The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.