Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Net Use, Encryption Program
Allowed As Evidence In Sex Case
In a case involving allegations of attempting to use a minor in a sexual performance, the trial court admitted evidence of the defendant's Internet use and of the existence of an encryption program on his computer. Specifically, the trial court admitted parts of a computer forensic report that revealed the defendant used search terms such as “Lolita” relating to sex with minors. The computer forensics expert who authored the report testified that the computer also contained the text of a statute relating to sex with minors and an encryption program. The expert stated that the encryption program could “basically encrypt any file” and that “other than the National Security Agency,” he was not aware of anyone who could break such an encryption. On appeal, the defendant argued that his case was prejudiced because the court specifically used evidence of his Internet use and the encryption program in finding him guilty. The defendant also contended that these factors were unrelated to the charges in the case. The appellate court rejected the defendant's argument and found that the evidence was appropriately admitted, noting that: “the district court did exclude other and more inflammatory search terms and phrases because it found them more prejudicial than probative. … Evidence of appellant's computer usage and the presence of an encryption program on his computer was relevant to the state's case.”
e-Discovery Docket Sheet and Computer Forensics Docket Sheet were written by Michele C.S. Lange, a member of this newsletter's Board of Editors, and a staff attorney with Kroll Ontrack, with assistance from Charity Delich, a Kroll Ontrack law clerk. Lange has published numerous articles and speaks regularly on the topics of electronic discovery, computer forensics and technology's role in the law. Information in these summaries is taken from the Kroll Ontrack monthly E-Discovery Case Law Update and Computer Forensics newsletters, which may be accessed at http://www.krollontrack.com/. Lange can be reached at [email protected].
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.