Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The discussion of stem cell research seems to touch all the bases – religious, legal, ethical, financial and scientific. With such a disparate range of views and contentions, along with the federal government's abdication of any sort of leadership role, it will be difficult and take a great deal of time, energy, emotion and dollars, to reach a consensus view.
In an effort to bring leadership to a number of these issues, on April 26, 2005, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) issued its Guidelines For Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research (Guidelines). Developed on behalf of the scientific community, and without governmental involvement, the report sets forth a series of guidelines “to advance the science in a responsible manner.” They are intended to provide a guidance for all derivations of human embryonic stem (hES) cells using hES cells derived from blastocysts made for reproductive purposes and later obtained for research from IVF clinics, blastocysts made specifically for research using IVF and somatic cell nuclear transfer (NT) into oocytes. Notably, the NAS guidelines do not address reproductive uses of NT, in as much as the NAS had previously concluded that human reproductive cloning should not be practiced at all. (See Scientific and Medical Aspects of Human Reproductive Cloning, National Academy of Sciences, 2002; NAS Guidelines, at page 4.) The NAS Guidelines reach a broad variety of subjects. The focus of this article, however, is upon the ethical issues addressed by the Guidelines.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.