Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Cameo Clips
Music Royalty Claims
The U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico dismissed a royalties-based suit by salsa artist Gilberto Santa Rosa. Santa Rosa v. Combo Records, 04-1405 (JAG). The district court first decided on Santa Rosa's contract claims (Santa Rosa didn't have a copy but claimed to have entered into a contract with Combo Records as early as 1978) that: “Santa Rosa does not remember what the contract contained, and lacks any proof of its formation from witnesses or a record of the instrument. … Because this Court cannot find an express or an implied contract without any facts, nor any sort of enforceable promise, the Court will not address Santa Rosa's claim of breach nor grant his request to rescind the contract.”
The court next found Santa Rosa's claim for a declaration of ownership of the recordings at issue time-barred by the Copyright Act's 3-year statute of limitations, stating: “Santa Rosa did not state any facts that explain his decades-long absence of concern [of non-payment of royalties] and still support a finding that he was reasonably diligent in protecting his interests.” Finally, the court concluded on Santa Rosa's Lanham Act claim alleging that his name had been omitted from the recordings: “Santa Rosa has to rely on the laws designed to address his concerns as the inventor and not producer or manufacturer of a product to make his claim against Combo Records; in this case, the Copyright Act and not the Lanham Act.”
Film Production/Character Depictions
The producers and distributors of the film “Hardball” were entitled to summary judgment in a suit by an individual who claimed that the unflattering depiction of a character in the movie amounted to defamation, false light and related personal-rights violations, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, ruled. Muzikowski v. Paramount Pictures Corp., 01 C 6721. Plaintiff Robert Muzikowski had been portrayed in the nonfiction book “Hardball: A Season in the Projects,” to which Paramount bought the film rights, for his work in starting baseball teams for young people. The district initially dismissed Muzikowski's suit for failure to state a claim on which relief could be granted. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Stranger to the Deed Rule
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.