Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Second Circuit defines standard for loss causation pleadings: The District Court for the Southern District of New York has ruled that the pleading standard for loss causation in the Second Circuit requires plaintiffs in a securities fraud case to allege a concealment of risk and to show that this concealment caused the plaintiff's loss. Amy Liu v. Credit Suisse First Boston, 04 Civ 3757 (June 27).
The case involved an investor and a class of plaintiffs alleging that the issuers and lead underwriter involved in several IPOs defrauded investors by setting their earnings estimates below their true estimates to dramatically drive up the prices of the IPOs once they went public. In analyzing the proper pleading standard, the court was faced with what it called “ambiguous” precedent in the Second Circuit. The Supreme Court's recent decision in Dura Pharmaceuticals v. Broudo, 125 S.Ct. 1627, 1630 (2005), held that to prove fraud, plaintiffs must provide a direct link between a fall in a company's stock price and the alleged fraud or misrepresentation. In so ruling, the Supreme Court rejected the more liberal standard applied by the Ninth Circuit, which allowed plaintiffs to prove loss causation without showing a direct link between a drop in a company's stock price and misrepresentation or fraud.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.