Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
California Supreme Court Rules on Benefits
The California Supreme Court ruled on Aug. 1 that businesses in the state must grant same-sex partners the same privileges as married couples, if the individuals are registered with the state as domestic partners. Koebke v. Bernardo Heights Country Club, 05 C.D.O.S. 6731.
While the ruling was hailed as a victory by the same-sex marriage proponents, it stopped short of saying that the state's anti-discrimination law has always prohibited discrimination against all same-sex couples. Instead, the court ruled that equal status under state law came only with domestic-partner legislation that took effect on Jan. 1, 2005. Consequently, a private country club could not deny spousal benefits to a lesbian couple who have registered for domestic partnership.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.