Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
“Ambush marketing,” a term coined by Jerry Wexler, manager of global marketing efforts for American Express in the 1980s, refers to the marketing activities of companies that manage to associate themselves, or their products or services, with high-profile events without paying to become an “official sponsor.” Wexler lucidly describes an ambush marketer's motivations in the 2002 “IEG Sponsorship Report” published by IEG, Inc.:
Given the escalating price of major sponsorships, it is hardly surprising that some companies willingly pass on the opportunity to sponsor and search instead for ways to compete in the sponsored space without bearing the onerous costs and the heavy burden of the scandals and other misadventures often associated with large, modern sponsored properties.
The point is that sponsors do not buy the rights to all avenues leading to the public's awareness of a given property, and more importantly, do not buy the rights to the thematic space in which the purchased property is usually the only one resident. In other words, all else other than that which is specifically purchased is up for grabs.
This article looks at several examples of ambush marketers seizing opportunities that are “up for grabs” as well as the corresponding legal strategies employed by event organizers and official sponsors to combat such activities. Overall, despite the best efforts of the various event organizers and official sponsors, ambush marketing cases are rarely actionable. Careful ambush marketers avoid using the trademarks, trade names, copyrights or other exclusive intellectual property rights associated with a given sponsored event, making it difficult to successfully assert infringement claims.
Sponsoring Media Coverage of an Event
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.