Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
It is becoming increasingly common for franchise companies to acquire their competitors. Predictably, the franchisees of the acquired system often will feel threatened and take legal action.
In Hanson Hams, Inc. v. HBH Franchise Company, LLC, Bus. Fran. Guide (CCH) '13,093 (Dec. 20, 2004), the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, recently considered such a case. In Hanson Hams, a Heavenly Ham franchisee filed a complaint against the franchisor of the HoneyBaked Ham franchise system for allegedly “unfair” conduct occurring after the defendant's subsidiary acquired the Heavenly Ham franchise system. Plaintiff alleged that after the acquisition, defendant favored the Honey-Baked Ham system over the Heavenly Ham system and that such disparate treatment violated Florida's “little FTC Act” (Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (“FDUTPA”), Florida Statutes ”501.201, et seq.). In a thorough and well-reasoned decision, the court concluded that defendant's conduct was not unfair within the meaning of the FDUTPA as a matter of law. The court found it particularly telling that the plaintiff had not asserted any claim against its franchisor (a subsidiary of defendant).
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.