Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Why CA's Anti-SLAPP Statute Should Apply to Peer Review
California law protects defendants from lawsuits designed to thwart “a person's right of petition or free speech under the United States or California Constitution in connection with a public issue.” The “anti-SLAPP” (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) statute provides this protection by permitting the defendant to move to strike the plaintiff's complaint at the outset of litigation unless the plaintiff can demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits of the claim. (Cal. Code Civ. Proc., ' 425.16, subd. (e)).
The model SLAPP suit is one “'filed by a large land developer against environmental activists or a neighborhood association intended to chill the defendants' continued political or legal opposition to the developers' plans.'” Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & Opportunity (1999) 19 Cal.4th 1106, 1125, citing Wilcox v. Superior Court (1994) 27 Cal.App.4th 809, 815, overruled on other grounds in Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc. (2002) 29 Cal.4th 53. Section 425.16, however, has been applied to dismiss complaints in a wide range of other contexts. See, eg, Briggs, supra, 19 Cal.4th 1106 (residential rental property owners' suit against nonprofit tenants' rights corporation); Colt v. Freedom Communications, Inc. (2003) 109 Cal.App.4th 1551 (public figures' suit against newspaper); Dove Audio Inc. v. Rosenfeld, Meyer & Susman (1996) 47 Cal.App.4th 777 (record publisher's suit against law firm); Averill v. Superior Court (1996) 42 Cal.App.4th 1170, 1175 (home buyer's suit against seller). Since enactment of the anti-SLAPP statute, the question has arisen: What are the effects of the anti-SLAPP statute on peer review boards and their members when a disgruntled physician seeks to recover for injuries he feels the board's activities have caused him?
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
New York's Latest Cybersecurity Commitment
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
How AI Has Affected PR
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.