Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Nebraska Supreme Court Rejects Infancy Tolling Argument for Statute of Repose
In a case of first impression, the Nebraska Supreme Court has rejected arguments that the state's product liability statute of repose should be tolled for minors. Budler v. General Motors Corp., 689 N.W.2d 847 (Neb. 2004). The ruling was en banc and unanimous. The court's decision was the result of thoughtful analysis and application of well-established principles of statutory interpretation. The impact of the ruling is significant, however, given the state's long-standing public policy of preserving a minor's cause of action until he/she reaches the age of majority.
The issue reached the court when the Eighth Circuit certified the question to the Nebraska Supreme Court in a vehicle product liability case pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska. Budler v. General Motors Corp., 400 F.3d 618, 619 (8th Cir. 2005). The minor, Andrew Budler, was injured on April 3, 1998, when the 1991 Pontiac Grand Prix in which he was a passenger rolled over. Budler sustained serious injuries and was paralyzed from the neck down. He was 19 years old at the time of the accident, and under Nebraska law was still considered a minor for purposes of bringing legal claims. On Oct. 3, 2000, Budler turned 21. On April 2, 2002 (just before the 4-year statute of limitations would have run), Budler's parents, after being appointed as his conservators, filed suit against General Motors Corporation ' the vehicle manufacturer. The Budlers asserted product liability claims for negligence and strict liability. On Oct. 10, 2002, Budler died as a result of the injuries he had sustained in the accident. The complaint was then amended to reflect his parents' status as personal representatives of his estate.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
A Lawyer's System for Active Reading
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Blockchain Domains: New Developments for Brand Owners
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.