Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Back Child Support

By Elliott Scheinberg
November 29, 2005

The Child Support Standards Act (CSSA) was enacted to promote New York's public policy concern that both parents contribute to their children's support — and in response to federal law that mandatory support guidelines be in effect as a predicate to eligibility for federal funding. Panossian v. Panossian, 201 A.D.2d 983 (4th Dept., 1994); Rakoszynski v. Rakoszynski, 174 Misc.2d 509 (1997). It is settled law that agreements that contract away the obligation to pay child support are void as against public policy and, thus, unenforceable. Strenge v. Bearman, 228 A.D.2d 664 (1996). Although seemingly straightforward, the narrowly defined statutory scheme regarding the retroactivity of child support has been indirectly, yet, significantly broadened as a result of recent judicial authority involving unrelated issues.

Statutory law provides that child support is “effective as of the date of the application therefore (DRL ' 236B(7), DRL ' 240(j), and FCA ' 449),” which leaves two categories of custodial parents severely constrained in any attempts to retrieve child support for unpaid periods: 1) those in Family Court seeking pre-application date support, and 2) those in post judgment/order proceedings (in Supreme or Family Court) following a de facto change of custody where the new custodial parent seeks support for the gap of time between the actual change of custody and the application for support. While parents in divorce actions with no extant support awards have recourse for back support via a cause of action in necessaries, relief is now newly available to the two aforementioned categories of parents who would otherwise have continued to remain hamstrung in their efforts to obtain child support.

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.