Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Bit Parts

Documentaries/Defamation

The Supreme Court of New York allowed Georgeann Walsh Ward to proceed with a defamation claim against musician Gene Simmons over the VH1 documentary “When KISS Ruled the World.” Ward acknowledged that she had been in a 3-year, monogamous relationship with Simmons 30 years ago, but was married to her husband shortly after. The court noted: “The repeated use of plaintiff's photographs during the documentary could lead a reasonable viewer to conclude that plaintiff was a woman who would regularly make herself available to Simmons, at his beck and call, for casual sexual encounters. Although it is true that the documentary never mentions plaintiff by name, or otherwise identifies her, the use of her photographs during the '24 Hour Whore' segment could certainly lead a reasonable person to conclude that she was one of those women with whom Simmons had a casual sexual liaison.” Ward v. Klein, 100231-05. But the court dismissed Ward's right-of-publicity claim on the ground that under New York Civil Rights Law Sec. 51 because “the use of plaintiff's image in the documentary does not constitute a use for advertising or trade purposes as required by the statute.”


Music Royalties/Foreign-Tax Deductions

The New York Appellate Division affirmed that Phil Spector's Philles Records can't deduct foreign VAT taxes from royalties it owes members of the 1960s group The Ronettes because “[t]o the extent any ambiguity might be deemed to exist as to the parties' 1963 Agreement regarding the calculation of taxes, the trial court properly construed it against the drafter [Philles] … as requiring that taxes not be taken into consideration when determining, for the purpose of computing royalties due plaintiffs under the Agreement, the net retail price for replacement records.” The appellate division also affirmed that Philles can't “deduct packaging costs based upon what defendants are charged by their licensees.” Greenfield v. Philles Records Inc., 2005 NY Slip Op 8613.


Sound-Recording Licenses/Unjust Enrichment Claims

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases Image

The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?