Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Dismissal of jury's insider trading guilty verdict upheld: A divided Second Circuit has upheld the dismissal of a guilty verdict against a computer company executive who was convicted of insider trading in connection with a tender offer, finding that the jury's verdict was based upon insufficient evidence. United States v. Cassese, 03-1710 (Oct. 24).
The president and CEO of Computer Horizons, John Cassese, entered merger discussions with another computer company, Compuware Corp., but Horizons' board rejected the proposal. Later, Compuware's CEO called Cassese and informed him that they were no longer interested in buying Computer Horizons, and that his company was about to acquire another company. Cassese then purchased 15,000 shares of that company, which he sold following the public announcement of the acquisition. The SEC filed an insider trading complaint against Cassese who consented to an order of judgment against him, disgorged his profits and paid penalties and interest. Cassese was also prosecuted for insider trading. Following an initial mistrial, Cassese was convicted by a jury of securities fraud in connection with a tender offer under Section 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 14e-3. The district court judge overturned the verdict, however, finding that in criminal cases under '14(e) and Rule 14e-3, where no other securities laws violations are alleged, the government, in order to prove willfulness, must prove that the defendant believed that the material nonpublic information he traded upon related to, or most likely related to, a tender offer. The district court found that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support the jury's finding that Cassese acted with criminal intent.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.