Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

When Does A Workday Begin? When Does It End?

By Robert B. Cottington
November 29, 2005

These relatively simple questions are not always easy to answer, particularly when they pertain to pay issues under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). On Nov. 8, 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court provided some needed clarification in two consolidated cases ' IBP, Inc. v. Alvarez (No. 03-1238) and Tum v. Barber Foods, Inc. (No. 04-66).

In these cases, the Court addressed whether employees in meat and poultry processing plants must be paid for non-productive time they spend walking from locker rooms where they are required to don protective clothing and equipment, to the meat or poultry processing floor where they perform their work, and for the time they spend walking back to the locker rooms from the processing floor. In Tum, the Court also addressed whether time spent waiting in line to put on the protective clothing or to take it off was compensable. These cases turned on the application of Section 4(a) of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. '254(a), which excludes from the FLSA time spent walking, riding, or traveling to and from the location of the employee's principal work activity as well as other preliminary and postliminary activities.

In a unanimous decision, the Court held that the Portal Act does not apply to the walking that occurs between the time the employees put on the protective equipment and when they take it off or to the waiting time prior to taking off the equipment at the end of the day. The Court, however, held that the waiting time prior to donning the gear at the start of the day was excluded from the FLSA by the Portal Act. The Court's decision turned on a “continuous workday” analysis. As discussed in greater detail below, the Court held that the workday in these cases began and ended with the donning and doffing of protective equipment and clothing since those activities were “integral and indispensable” to the employees' work and that the walking and waiting time that occurred during this continuous workday was compensable. The Court further held that the waiting time prior to donning the clothing at the start of the day was a preliminary activity within the meaning of the Portal Act since it came before the start of the “continuous workday” and therefore was not compensable.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Stranger to the Deed Rule Image

In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.