Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On Nov. 7, 2005, Grokster LTD (Grokster) filed documents in a Los Angeles federal court reporting that it had reached a settlement in its lengthy legal case with the nation's largest record companies, motion picture studios and music publishers (as represented by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA)).
As part of the reported settlement, Grokster admitted monetary liability in the amount of $50 million dollars and agreed to immediately shutter its popular peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing service. Grokster's Web site was changed the same day to state that its existing file-sharing service was illegal and no longer available. Specifically, the site states that: “There are legal services for downloading music and movies. This service is not one of them.” However, the Web site notes that Grokster hopes to have a “safe and legal” replacement available soon apparently under the proposed name “Grokster3G.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
This article reviews the fundamental underpinnings of the concept of insurable interest, and certain recent cases that have grappled with the scope of insurable interest and have articulated a more meaningful application of the concept to claims under first-party property policies.