Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Two recent decisions ' one by an Illinois state court and the other by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ' reveal that courts remain divided as to whether general liability policies provide coverage for fax-advertising claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”). Generally, the TCPA prohibits, among other things, the use of fax machines or other devices to send “an unsolicited advertisement to a telephone facsimile machine.” 47 U.S.C. '227(b)(3). The TCPA provides a private right of action by the recipients of such faxes to sue the senders. Id. Notably, under the TCPA, the recipient does not have to demonstrate any injury to prevail on its claim; the receipt of an unsolicited fax is sufficient to trigger liability under the statute.
In Resource Bankshares Corp. v. St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co., 407 F.3d 631 (4th Cir. 2005) (Va. law), the Fourth Circuit held that an insurer did not have a duty to defend or indemnify an insured against alleged violations of the TCPA. In contrast, in Valley Forge Ins. Co. v. Swiderski Electronics, Inc., 834 N.E. 2d 562 (Ill. App. 2005), an appellate court in Illinois rejected the Resource Bankshares analysis and held that the insurer was obligated to provide a defense. The contrasting results in these two cases ' as well as in other cases ' stem solely from differing interpretations of the scope of the “personal and advertising injury” and “property damage” coverages under a general liability policy.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.