Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The ubiquity of e-discovery is undeniable. Data storage surrounds us ' in our workplaces, our cars, our homes, when we go out to dinner, even on vacation. In all these places, we use devices that record and store data; some will find its way onto networks and some may not.
As a result, data management and e-discovery have become critical to businesses for managing and controlling litigation costs ' as well as for using electronic records effectively in litigation and at trial.
Unfortunately, many businesses have not developed appropriate document-management plans prior to litigation, and many lawyers are not prepared to handle the complexities of e-discovery once litigation begins. Not a month (and sometimes not even a week) goes by without a new decision reporting sanctions for failure to handle electronic documents appropriately.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.