Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Case Notes
No Negative Inference Instruction When Evidence Destroyed During Normal Course of Business
A negative inference instruction will not be granted where the evidence was destroyed in the normal course of business and where the defendant neither intentionally destroyed the evidence nor had actual control over the evidence at the time it was destroyed; the litigation may continue without the actual vehicle where evidence of other similar accidents existed. Davis v. Ford Motor Company et al, Civil Action No. 3:02CV271LN, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, Jackson Division, June 23, 2005.
In 2000, Davis rented a 2000 Ford Explorer from Hertz. Davis suffered injuries after an accident in which the Explorer rolled over and he was ejected from the vehicle. Davis did not consult with an attorney regarding an action against Ford and Hertz until 1 year after the accident, claiming she was involved in her own physical and emotional recovery from the accident. An action was not commenced until 2002. Meanwhile, 3 months after the accident, Hertz sold the Explorer to a salvage yard in the normal course of business. At the time of the sale, Hertz had no notice of any potential litigation involving the Explorer. The court concluded that the sale and subsequent repair of the vehicle could not amount to intentional or negligent destruction of evidence and that the proposed negative inference instruction requested by the plaintiff could not be justified.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Stranger to the Deed Rule
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.