Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
It is not pleasant to contemplate suing an expert hired to testify for your client. Nevertheless, an attorney's cautious and prudent behavior may be enhanced and professional anguish minimized by frank consideration of the unpleasant possibilities.
The pivotal questions, around which numerous subsidiary issues easily cluster, are these:
Variations on these thematic questions can proliferate. What if a plaintiff were forced, because of a court's “gatekeeping” finding of expert unreliability pursuant to Daubert or Frye, to settle a sizeable claim for a fraction of what it was worth? Could the expert who flunked the reliability threshold be sued for the difference between the pittance paid in settlement and the more generous amount that may have been obtained had the expert been allowed to enter the reliability “gate”? Could the lawyer who hired, prepared and presented the expert be implicated in claims based on the expert's failure to pass muster?
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.