Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
For many years, corporations and other clients have employed in-house counsel to provide legal services, either in conjunction with outside counsel or not. A more recent trend is for law firms to designate a partner or group of attorneys to serve as in-house legal counsel to the firm. One of the thornier issues for in-house counsel in both contexts centers upon the unique ethics issues that must be considered and addressed.
In that regard, most lawyers considering their ethical obligations under applicable rules of professional conduct typically aren't employees or partners of the client itself. Likewise, ethics rules and authorities, virtually invariably, address the traditional attorney-client relationship. The role of in-house corporate and law firm counsel, from an ethical perspective, has received very little reported attention.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
This article reviews the fundamental underpinnings of the concept of insurable interest, and certain recent cases that have grappled with the scope of insurable interest and have articulated a more meaningful application of the concept to claims under first-party property policies.