Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Liability insurance policies apply where the insured is liable for bodily injury, property damage, or wrongful acts (depending on the policy). What happens, however, when the policyholder denies that any injury or wrongdoing took place? Does that mean that insurance is not applicable?
Perhaps the most pointed illustration concerns Dow Corning, which denied that its breast implants caused injury but entered into a major settlement. In its coverage case, its insurers turned around and argued that, because the policies apply to “injury” and because Dow Corning denied there was “injury,” the insurers had no obligation (or technically that their policies had not been triggered). The court made short work of this argument:
[I]f an underlying plaintiff alleges that she suffered injuries caused by a Dow Corning breast implant … [and] Dow Corning settles claims on the basis of those allegations, defendants must indemnify Dow Corning based on those allegations. This conclusion is not based on a theory of res judicata or collateral estoppel, or law of the case. Rather, it is based on a plain reading of the policy language. Dow Corning Corp. v. Continental Cas. Co., 1999 WL 33435067 at *5 (Mich. App. Oct. 12, 1999).
As the court aptly put it, “the question in this insurance dispute is not 'what really happened?' Instead, the question is … 'what did Dow Corning fear a judge or jury might believe happened?'” Id. at *5 n.8.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.