Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Legal analysts can stop putting 'proposed' before the word 'amendments' concerning long-coming changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure relating to e-discovery. On April 12, the U.S. Supreme Court approved the amendments without comment. The OK was a formality following extensive debate while the Rules Committee pondered the changes.
The amendments affect Rules 16, 26, 33, 34, 37, and 45, and Form 35.
Many attorneys have known about the amendments for years, but counsel who thought e-discovery had little impact on their cases or litigation in general have until Dec. 1 to consider the rules' implications.
See the amendments (73 pages worth) at www.supremecourtus.gov/orders/courtorders/frcv06p.pdf.
Legal analysts can stop putting 'proposed' before the word 'amendments' concerning long-coming changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure relating to e-discovery. On April 12, the U.S. Supreme Court approved the amendments without comment. The OK was a formality following extensive debate while the Rules Committee pondered the changes.
The amendments affect Rules 16, 26, 33, 34, 37, and 45, and Form 35.
Many attorneys have known about the amendments for years, but counsel who thought e-discovery had little impact on their cases or litigation in general have until Dec. 1 to consider the rules' implications.
See the amendments (73 pages worth) at www.supremecourtus.gov/orders/courtorders/frcv06p.pdf.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?