Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
China Gets Its Own Version of Wikipedia
With the real thing banned since late last year, the Chinese search engine Baidu has launched its own version of the popular U.S. Internet encyclopedia Wikipedia.
The site is called Baidu Baike (http://baike.baidu.com; make sure you turn the Chinese language option, if you have one, on in your Internet browser) and was released in April 2006. Reports say that the site already has over 100,000 entries (although some accuse Baidu if taking them right from Wikipedia). The difference between Baidu Baike and the original? Many of the topics that made Wikipedia so controversial in China ' Taiwan, Tibet, Tiananmen Square ' are not listed on Baidu Baike. Articles that are included are censored, and the site doesn't maintain a neutral stance on some topics, critics say.
Another popular Web site is already offering a Chinese government approved version ' Google. Baidu, however, remains the country's most popular search engine.
Steven Salkin, Esq. is the Managing Editor of The China Trade Law Report. He can be reached at [email protected].
With the real thing banned since late last year, the Chinese search engine Baidu has launched its own version of the popular U.S. Internet encyclopedia Wikipedia.
The site is called Baidu Baike (http://baike.baidu.com; make sure you turn the Chinese language option, if you have one, on in your Internet browser) and was released in April 2006. Reports say that the site already has over 100,000 entries (although some accuse Baidu if taking them right from Wikipedia). The difference between Baidu Baike and the original? Many of the topics that made Wikipedia so controversial in China ' Taiwan, Tibet, Tiananmen Square ' are not listed on Baidu Baike. Articles that are included are censored, and the site doesn't maintain a neutral stance on some topics, critics say.
Another popular Web site is already offering a Chinese government approved version '
Steven Salkin, Esq. is the Managing Editor of The China Trade Law Report. He can be reached at [email protected].
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Stranger to the Deed Rule
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.