Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Achieving Optimal Evaluation of Business and Commercial Cases

By Louis Solomon
June 28, 2006

Perhaps one of the most important services an attorney can provide to a client is discerning the merits of a case and the likely outcomes during the course of litigation. But what is the best way to go about evaluating a case? And if, as experience has taught, there is no 'best' way to evaluate a case, are there some really good ones that can be counted on to give the client sound advice over a broad range of potential types of cases?

First, it is important to know that case evaluation is neither a science nor really an art. Given the almost limitless known and unknown factors that shape the final litigation outcomes, perfection is almost impossible to achieve. The goal is to arrive at an 'optimal' evaluation.

When done, well, optimally, an optimal case evaluation allows lawyer and client to use their collective judgment to identify and weigh the significance of the pivotal issues that a company or individual client faces in litigation:

  • Whether the client should or should not prosecute or defend the action at all;
  • What resources (counsel fees, management time, settlement dollars) should be devoted to the task;
  • What strategies should be pursued both within and without the litigation;
  • Whether and when to consider settlement; and
  • What kind of costs can or should be imposed on the opposing party.

There is another benefit to careful case evaluation. In our modern litigious climate, senior managers and counsel must be ever-mindful of the prospect of a special investigator, internal investigator, the government or shareholders (in the form of class action or derivative suit) who will try to second-guess judgments that were made in litigating or not litigating, or settling or not settling. A rational and professional case evaluation process is a good means of reducing the exposure to liability in these circumstances.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Stranger to the Deed Rule Image

In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.