Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
When a doctor obtains insurance from more than one carrier and both policies contain language along these lines ' 'Insurance under this coverage is excess of and payable only after all other valid insurance limits of coverage have been exhausted' ' which will be deemed the primary policy and which the excess policy? Or will they each cancel the other out? The answer will depend on myriad criteria, including the specific language of the policies, the amount the insured paid for coverage and whether one policy identifies the other insurer as the primary insurer.
A policy is primary if the insured has a right to collect the proceeds in the event of a loss regardless of any other insurance he may have. It is excess if his right is contingent on his having exhausted the limits of his primary insurance policy. While a 'true' excess insurance policy is one that specifically requires the insured to have other insurance coverage before it will be held responsible for any part of a claim, many policies are not explicit enough to dispel all questions on the subject; sometimes the circumstances of the claim and the existence of overlapping insurance policies complicate matters. Each case requires its own analysis. In most states, when two insurance policies covering the same risk both contain 'other insurance' clauses that cannot be reconciled, those clauses cancel each other out and the insurers share in liability pro rata. See, eg, State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Holton, 131 Ga.App. 247 (Ga. Ct.App. 1974); Lumberman Mut. Cas. Co. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 435 NYS2d 953 (1980.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
A common question that commercial landlords and tenants face is which of them is responsible for a repair to the subject premises. These disputes often center on whether the repair is "structural" or "nonstructural."