Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The growing popularity of therapy for everything from marriage troubles to drinking problems has the mental health care community paranoid about lawsuits. Legal and health care experts say that therapists today face a greater risk of being sued than ever before, particularly given the 55% divorce rate and the breakdown of the family.
The fear of litigation is especially high among therapists who get tangled in messy custody disputes and get blamed for the loss of child custody. 'They are in the most dangerous environment in America ' and that's getting in between parents and their children,' said Eric C. Marine, vice president of claims for the American Professional Agency, which provides malpractice insurance to mental health care professionals. Marine, who is writing a white paper titled 'The Cleavers Have Left the Building,' believes that the breakdown of the family has pushed more people into therapy and, consequently, has triggered more suits against therapists in recent years. He should know. He sees the therapists' malpractice claims, and often gets phone calls from them upset about a lawsuit or a complaint. 'When I was young, nobody ever said anything about seeing a shrink. And even if you were seeing one, you didn't tell anyone. Today, I think that's why there are more lawsuits because therapy is now mainstream,' Marine said.
Grim Statistics
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.