Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
False Endorsement Claims
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York granted a preliminary injunction barring the use of the 'Lil' Kim' mark to advertise or promote a DVD documentary of the rap group Junior M.A.F.I.A. Jones v. Ground Zero Entertainment, 05 Civ. 6461(JSR). Prior to her solo career, Lil' Kim (Kimberly Jones) had been a member of Junior M.A.F.I.A. She filed suit after her likeness and 'Lil' Kim' name were used on the documentary's cover and promotional materials. The complaint alleged, among other things: false endorsement and false advertising in violation of Sec. 43(a) of the Lanham Act; deceptive trade practices; unfair competition; misappropriation; and unjust enrichment. The district court explained: 'Although not persuaded that Jones is likely to prevail on certain of her claims, the Court finds that Jones is likely to prevail on her claim that the defendants' use of her trade name, 'Lil' Kim,' constitutes false endorsement in violation of the Lanham Act. Because the 'Lil' Kim' mark appears prominently on certain of the covers of the DVD, as well as some of the promotional material, in a manner that suggests endorsement, 'an appreciable number of ordinarily prudent purchasers are likely to be misled, or indeed simply confused, as to the source of the goods in question' ' Defendants say that the use of 'Lil' Kim' is simply descriptive of one of the prominent persons featured in the documentary. The doctrine of fair use … permits use of a protected mark by others to describe certain aspects of the user's own goods ' but is inapplicable here, as the Court finds (for purposes of preliminary injunctive relief only) that the use here strongly suggests en-dorsement and, in any event, was not in good faith.'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.