Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Trademark Decisions Update

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
November 02, 2006

False Endorsement Claims

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York granted a preliminary injunction barring the use of the 'Lil' Kim' mark to advertise or promote a DVD documentary of the rap group Junior M.A.F.I.A. Jones v. Ground Zero Entertainment, 05 Civ. 6461(JSR). Prior to her solo career, Lil' Kim (Kimberly Jones) had been a member of Junior M.A.F.I.A. She filed suit after her likeness and 'Lil' Kim' name were used on the documentary's cover and promotional materials. The complaint alleged, among other things: false endorsement and false advertising in violation of Sec. 43(a) of the Lanham Act; deceptive trade practices; unfair competition; misappropriation; and unjust enrichment. The district court explained: 'Although not persuaded that Jones is likely to prevail on certain of her claims, the Court finds that Jones is likely to prevail on her claim that the defendants' use of her trade name, 'Lil' Kim,' constitutes false endorsement in violation of the Lanham Act. Because the 'Lil' Kim' mark appears prominently on certain of the covers of the DVD, as well as some of the promotional material, in a manner that suggests endorsement, 'an appreciable number of ordinarily prudent purchasers are likely to be misled, or indeed simply confused, as to the source of the goods in question' ' Defendants say that the use of 'Lil' Kim' is simply descriptive of one of the prominent persons featured in the documentary. The doctrine of fair use … permits use of a protected mark by others to describe certain aspects of the user's own goods ' but is inapplicable here, as the Court finds (for purposes of preliminary injunctive relief only) that the use here strongly suggests en-dorsement and, in any event, was not in good faith.'

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls Image

With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.