Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Emfore v. Blimpie: License to Commit Fraud or Common-Sense Decision?

By J. David Mayberry and Rupert M. Barkoff
November 30, 2006

Better ingredients, it is said, make for a better pizza, and, as Emfore Corp. v. Blimpie Associates, Ltd. (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Sept. 18, 2006) suggests, better documents make for better decisions, at least if you are the franchisor.

The facts of Emfore are unremarkable in that most of us have come across similar situations in our careers. Plaintiffs franchisees want to buy a franchise. During the course of the sales negotiations, defendant franchisor's sales representatives toss out various numbers, presumably to whet the interests of the prospective purchasers. In this case, the numerical representations were in some cases puffery, and in other cases factual. In any event, franchisees buy the franchise, fail, and then bring suit claiming that they were defrauded in the sales process. Franchisor points out that the documents contain an integration clause, making reliance on these outside-the-document representations inherently suspect. Generally, franchisor wins.

Read These Next
Law Firms are Reducing Redundant Real Estate by Bringing Support Services Back to the Office Image

A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Bit Parts Image

Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights

Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes Image

“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.

Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel Image

'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.