Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Discrimination and ADA Claims
Lack of evidence of race-based animus or impairment-limiting life activity recently supported dismissal of wrongful termination suits. The pro se plaintiff, a black woman, worked at Liz Claiborne Inc. (LCI) from January 1998 until she was dismissed on Sept. 10, 1999, for poor work performance. She filed two lawsuits: In 2000, she alleged racial discrimination violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act; in 2003, she claimed discrimination, due to depression and allergies, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Family Medical Leave Act. She raised claims of a hostile work environment and disparate treatment, and alleged that she was dismissed in retaliation for reporting the discrimination. Adopting a magistrate judge's recommendation, the court summarily dismissed both suits. Finding the record devoid of evidence that the plaintiff's termination was due to other than unsatisfactory job performance and a volatile temperament, it ruled that she failed to make a prima facie case of wrongful termination due to race-based animus and also found no basis to conclude that the plaintiff's impairments substantially limited the major life activity of working. Riddle v. Liz Claiborne Inc., 00 Civ. 1374, (S.D.N.Y., October 26, 2006).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.