Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Deepening Insolvency Is Sinking Fast
Five years ago, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals opened the door to extensive litigation by holding, in Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors v. R.F. Lafftery & Co. (In re R.F. Lafftery & Co.), 267 F.3d 340 (3d Cir. 2001) ('Lafferty'), that Pennsylvania law would recognize a cause of action for 'deepening insolvency.' Two years later, a Delaware bankruptcy court held that Delaware law would also recognize a cause of action for deepening insolvency. Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors v. Credit Suisse First Boston. (In re Exide Technologies, Inc.), 299 B.R. 732 (Bankr.D.Del. 2003). As noted in a prior issue of The Bankruptcy Strategist (Paul Rubin, Lender's Victory over Trustee May Have Far-Reaching Implications, 22 Bankrupt-cy Strategist 4 (February 2005)(the 'Prior Article')), conflicting decisions have been issued by various other courts on whether deepening insolvency should be recognized as a separate cause of action. Since publication of that article, one court noted the 'growing acceptance' of deepening insolvency, In re LTV Steel Co., 333 B.R. 397, 422 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2005), but a number of other courts have rejected deepening insolvency as a cause of action. Amato v. Southwest Florida Heart Group, P.A. (In re Southwest Florida Heart Group, P.A.), 2006 WL 2147615 (Bankr. M.D.Fla. 2006); Alberts v. Tuft (In re Greater Southeast Cmty. Hosp. Corp.), 333 B.R. 506, 517 (Bankr. D.D.C. 2005); Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors v. Rural Tel. Fin. Coop. (In re Vartec Telecom, Inc.), 335 B.R. 631, 644 (Bankr. N.D.Tex. 2005).
Uniformity among courts on this question has not been and may never be reached. Nevertheless, recent decisions from the Third Circuit, the Delaware Chancery Court, and the Southern District of New York reflect an unmistakable and growing trend toward restricting significantly or even rejecting claims for deepening insolvency. This article describes this emerging trend, and demonstrates that each of these cases reflects an approach that appears to have developed within these respective courts. The common thread underlying these decisions is a concern that recognition of a claim for deepening insolvency would discourage good faith efforts to turnaround a troubled company that qualify for protection under the business judgment rule. This article concludes by identifying serious weaknesses from which deepening insolvency claims suffer in light of these significant rulings.
The Third Circuit Retrenches
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?