Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The patentee usually thinks its case looks pretty good when patent litigation begins. Discovery can change the patentee's outlook. A new prior art reference may create unanticipated invalidity issues. The accused infringer's product may not be what was expected, and infringement becomes questionable. The amount of recoverable damages may be less than expected and may not exceed the patentee's anticipated legal fees and expenses. In all these circumstances, and more, the patentee may want to end the litigation before judgment.
Settlement is an option, but the accused infringer is not always willing to settle or settle on terms acceptable to the patentee. The accused infringer may have invested heavily in its claim for a declaration judgment of invalidity or unenforceability and may demand its fees and expenses. If there is a pending summary judgment motion or trial is about to begin, the patentee may want to act quickly. The settlement negotiations may take too long. A covenant not to sue the alleged infringer for infringement of the patent can be the patentee's best option. The covenant strips the court of its jurisdiction to hear the case and abruptly ends the litigation, usually without any requirement that the patentee pay the accused infringer's fees or explain its reasons.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.