Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

<b>Counsel Concerns:</b> Fund Misappropriation and Suspension from Practice

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
December 28, 2006

The Court of Appeals of Maryland decided that an 18-month suspension of an attorney from practice for taking fees out of royalty distributions before submitting the royalties to a client should run consecutively with a suspension of the attorney for the same reason by the D.C. Court of Appeals. Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Midlen, Misc. Docket AG No. 4 Sept. Term, 2006. Attorney John H. Midlen, Jr. had been hired to represent the Jimmy Swaggart Ministries (JSM) for royalty distributions by the Librarian of Congress for cable TV broadcasts of JSM religious programs. Over time, JSM instructed Midlen to pay the royalties to JSM, which would then pay attorney fees to Midlen.

The DC court concluded in a reciprocal disciplinary proceeding that Midlen's taking of attorney fees before remitting the remainder of royalty distributions to JSM amounted to negligent misappropriation of client funds. When Midlen asked that an 18-month suspension from the D.C. Bar run concurrently with one from the Maryland Bar, the Maryland appellate court noted that though it may have considered an even more severe sanction, its decision to suspend Midlen 'shall commence upon the issuance of this opinion and run for its full term of eighteen months.'

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law &amp; Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.