Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Net-Profit Rights/Movies Based on TV Shows. The Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division 7, decided that an agreement actors Robert Wagner and Natalie Wood entered into with Spelling-Goldberg Productions (SGP) for the parties to submit an idea to the ABC-TV network for what became the 1970s TV series, 'Charlie's Angels,' didn't entitle Wagner and his family trusts to 50% of the net profits from two movies based on the series. Wagner v. Columbia Pictures Industries Inc., B184523.
Wagner and Wood had entered into an agreement with SGP to star in the TV movie Love Song. The agreement also stated that the actors and SGP would 'jointly submit up to five ideas to ABC for the basis of a pilot script for the 1974-1975 television season.' After ABC accepted the 'Angels' series idea the parties had submitted, the Wagners and SGP entered into a separate agreement to equally split any net profits received by SGP.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
This article reviews the fundamental underpinnings of the concept of insurable interest, and certain recent cases that have grappled with the scope of insurable interest and have articulated a more meaningful application of the concept to claims under first-party property policies.