Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Hypothetical: Your firm represents a long-time client in a business transaction. In the course of the representation, an associate working on the matter becomes concerned about the ethical propriety of some action taken by the partner in charge. She sends an e-mail to the firm's in-house ethics counsel, who conducts an internal investigation of the matter. The partner, associate and other employees of the firm are interviewed. Various notes and memoranda to file are prepared. Nothing is disclosed to the client. Eventually, the deal goes forward and is a catastrophic failure. The client sues the firm for malpractice and requests all of the firm's documents relating to the matter.
Question: Can the firm decline to produce the e-mails, notes and memoranda relating to its internal investigation on the grounds that the material is
protected by the firm's own attorney-client or work product privileges?
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.