Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Vicarious Liability of Aircraft Owners and Lessors: A Chink in the Armor?
In 2005, the Superior Court of Rhode Island held that '44112 of Title 49 of the U.S. Code did not protect the owner and lessor of an aircraft from vicarious liability for negligence of a lessee of the aircraft. Coleman v. Windham Aviation Inc., No. CIV A K.C. 2004-0985, 2005 WL 1793907 (R.I. Super. July 18, 2005). This opinion is unsettling to aircraft owners, lessors, and secured parties who for many years have relied on a plain reading of '44112 to provide statutory protection from the imposition of vicarious liability. In light of the decision in Windham (and others discussed below), owners, lessors, of aircraft must be aware of the possibility that a state court may very well impose vicarious liability.
Because of the clear and unambiguous language of '44112 and its predecessors, including '1404 of the Federal Aviation Act, aircraft owners, lessors, and lenders have understandably done business in reliance on its clear protections:
(a) (1) 'lessor' means a person leasing for at least 30 days a civil aircraft, aircraft engine, or propeller.
(2) 'owner' means a person that owns a civil aircraft, aircraft engine, or propeller.
(3) 'secured party' means a person having a security interest in, or security title to, a civil aircraft, aircraft engine, or propeller under a conditional sales contract, equipment trust contract, chattel or corporate mortgage, or similar instrument.(b) Liability. A lessor, owner or secured party is liable for personal injury, death or property loss or damage on land or water only when a civil aircraft, aircraft engine, or propeller is in the actual possession or control of the lessor, owner or secured party, and the personal injury, death, or property loss or damage occurs because of ' (1) the aircraft, engine, or propeller; or (2) the flight of, or an object falling from, the aircraft, engine or propeller.
Notwithstanding this statutory protection against vicarious liability, which has existed in some form since 1948, the cases in this area are inconsistent at best
and generally give little comfort to the aviation community with regard to the
imposition of vicarious liability. The matter is complicated by the fact that many states still have laws most of which were adopted in the infancy of aviation, which provide that operators are strictly liable and owners are vicariously liable for damages caused by an aircraft. See, e.g., R.I. Gen. Laws Sec. 1-4-3 (2006).
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Judge Rules Shaquille O'Neal Will Face Securities Lawsuit for Promotion, Sale of NFTs
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain Domains: New Developments for Brand Owners
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
Coverage Issues Stemming from Dry Cleaner Contamination Suits
In recent years, there has been a growing number of dry cleaners claiming to be "organic," "green," or "eco-friendly." While that may be true with respect to some, many dry cleaners continue to use a cleaning method involving the use of a solvent called perchloroethylene, commonly known as perc. And, there seems to be an increasing number of lawsuits stemming from environmental problems associated with historic dry cleaning operations utilizing this chemical.